Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Step 3.5 Flash
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.8 to 33.3.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1436 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1411 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1421 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1419 |
Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1385 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1402 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1405 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Step 3.5 Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.