Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 2 categories and Solar Pro4 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Solar Pro4 leads 42.1 to 33.3.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 524K.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 524K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1416 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1427 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1377 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1381 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1385 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Solar Pro4?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.