Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#211); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.0—
Released2025-06-172024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked336

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
WeirdML35.2%—
LMArena Coding1373—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94113.14
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1377—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Omni-MATH48%—
LMArena Math1373—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—
LMArena Expert1373—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%
MMLU—68%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1369—
LMArena Chinese1404—
LMArena French1388—
LMArena German1389—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Russian1373—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
IFEval81%—
LMArena Instruction Following1367—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—
LMArena Longer Query1373—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1379—
LMArena Creative Writing1367—
WildBench81.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1366—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#211); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper