Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 42.7.
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2024-06-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1209 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1202 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1216 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1171 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1214 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1197 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1148 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1195 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1203 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1225 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1214 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.