Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

37.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Muse Glimmer leads 42.1 to 33.3.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.041.7
Released2025-06-172026-08-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3315

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Coding13731416
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode—44.9%
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Muse Glimmer: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts13771396
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
CritPt—2.6%
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94—

Math Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math13731417
Omni-MATH48%—

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert13731386
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Muse Glimmer: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English13691384
LMArena Chinese14041412
LMArena Russian13731390
LMArena French1388—
LMArena German1389—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following13671375
IFEval81%—

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query13731382
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text13791389
LMArena Creative Writing13671339
LMArena Multi-Turn13661399
WildBench81.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper