Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 38.5.
- Both cost about the same: $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1482 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1501 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | 1259 |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1463 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1463 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1451 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.