Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Magistral Medium
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Magistral Medium in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 22.2 to 8.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.5% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 16.2% for Magistral Medium.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $5 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Magistral Medium: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | 16.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1250 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Magistral Medium leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1223 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Magistral Medium: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1267 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1271 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1254 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Magistral Medium leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1295 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1275 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Magistral Medium?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Magistral Medium?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Magistral Medium better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.5 vs 39.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.