Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 2-34B
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#208); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | — |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | 104.81 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 44.1% |
| PIQA | — | 81.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 76.7% |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 42.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 54.5% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.7% |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 84.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | — |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Llama 2-34B?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#208); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 2-34B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.