Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Gemini 2.5 Deep Think does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | — | 51.4 |
| Released | 2025-08-01 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 2 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.74 |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 29% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 10.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1484 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Deep Think | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1450 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1482 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Deep Think better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Gemini 2.5 Deep Think does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Deep Think and Qwen3.7 Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Deep Think has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.