Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Wizardlm 70b
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 56.3.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1081 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1079 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1097 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1108 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Wizardlm 70b?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.