Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 26.8 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1339 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Step 1o Turbo 202506: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1335 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1318 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1186 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1380 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1310 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1348 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1340 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.