Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 30.1 to 15.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 66.7% for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.842.5
Released2024-12-062025-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked5425

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding13511441
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)13.5%—
Aider Polyglot38.2%—
WeirdML25.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.9%—
LiveBench Coding63.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.9%—
CadEval30%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
TheAgentCompany11.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%66.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts13461428
ARC-AGI-21.3%—
SimpleBench31.1%—
EnigmaEval1.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning78.2%—
DTBench63.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis69.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.36—
LiveBench66.9%—

Math Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Omni-MATH45.9%46.7%
LMArena Math13511440
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202557.8%—
LiveBench Math75.8%—
MATH Level 582.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MMLU-Pro73.7%78.6%
GPQA (HELM)55.6%63%
LMArena Expert13401416
GPQA Diamond64.1%—
Humanity's Last Exam6.6%—
Confabulations12.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
MMLU79.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Vision1158—
GeoBench77%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English13421407
LMArena Chinese13731461
LMArena French13901415
LMArena German13541416
LMArena Japanese12931398
LMArena Korean13141366
LMArena Russian13511403
LMArena Spanish13631436

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
IFEval84.1%81%
LMArena Instruction Following13361388
LiveBench Instruction Following85.8%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%55.6%
LMArena Longer Query13451403

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text13541417
LMArena Creative Writing13401333
WildBench80%80.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn13501415
Short-Story Creative Writing73.8%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1128—
LiveBench Language51.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper