Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 49.5.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1487 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1483 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1474 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1467 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1476 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1478 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.