Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 49.0.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1007 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.