Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs o1-mini
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 35 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and o1-mini in 3 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.6 to 67.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Instruction Following: 85.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 65.4% for o1-mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1-mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | 48% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1362 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | 18.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | 72.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1333 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 57.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | 62% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1358 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
Knowledge o1-mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 18.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1316 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), o1-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1292 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1302 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | 65.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1304 |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context o1-mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1321 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1244 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | 64.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | 40.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than o1-mini?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or o1-mini better for coding?
o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and o1-mini share?
35 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.