Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 26.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 40.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 131.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 30.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 49.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1255 |
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.