Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Mistral Nemo
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Nemo in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 49.5 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 82.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 10.8% for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Mistral Nemo leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 63.2% | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 118.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 10.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 29.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 881 |
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Mistral Nemo?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Mistral Nemo share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.