Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 5 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 54.2.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1025 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1047 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1072 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1060 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 998 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1058 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.