Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.4 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) Google

35.1

Rank #228 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

59.4

Rank #16 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 leads 61.8 to 15.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 1.3% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 74% for GPT-5.4.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and GPT-5.4 specifications
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index35.159.4
Released2024-12-062026-03-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked5468

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), GPT-5.4: 52.6 (#33)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
WeirdML25.8%77.7%
LMArena Coding13501497
SWE-bench Verified—76.9%
DeepSWE—51.8%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)13.5%—
Aider Polyglot38.2%—
LMArena WebDev—1465
SciCode—56.6%
GSO—31.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct45.9%—
LiveBench Coding63.4%—
MirrorCode—15.6%
BigCodeBench Complete59.9%—
CadEval30%—
ALE-Bench—1,607
AlgoTune—1.85

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), GPT-5.4: 46.5 (#13)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
Terminal-Bench—81.8%
APEX-Agents—52.4%
TheAgentCompany11.4%—
τ²-bench Banking—39.4%
DeepResearch Bench—35.1%
PostTrainBench—19%
GBAEval—45.1%
LMArena Search—1197
METR Time Horizons—74.3%
Vending-Bench 2—6,144

Reasoning GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), GPT-5.4: 61.8 (#19)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
ARC-AGI-21.3%74%
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%63.8%
EnigmaEval1.1%16%
LMArena Hard Prompts13461485
DTBench63.2%94.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index135.36156.81
SimpleBench31.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—91.3%
ARC-AGI-1—93.7%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—44%
Thematic Generalization—80%
EBR-Bench—25.4%
LiveBench Reasoning78.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—37%
LiveBench Data Analysis69.4%—
LMCA—52%
ForecastBench—59.5
LiveBench66.9%—

Math GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), GPT-5.4: 73.5 (#19)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202557.8%97.8%
LMArena Math13521488
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%47.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—78.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—49%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—83.1%
ProofBench—56%
Omni-MATH45.9%—
LiveBench Math75.8%—
MATH Level 582.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—27.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), GPT-5.4: 65.3 (#14)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond64.1%93.3%
Humanity's Last Exam6.6%36.2%
LMArena Expert13391507
SimpleQA Verified—45.1%
MMLU-Pro73.7%—
Confabulations12.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7%
GPQA (HELM)55.6%—
MMLU79.7%—

Multimodal GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), GPT-5.4: 43.7 (#20)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
LMArena Vision11581303
GeoBench77%—
Blueprint-Bench 2—27.1%
Furniture Assembly—37.5%
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), GPT-5.4: 56.2 (#23)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
LMArena Non-English13421465
LMArena Chinese13731519
LMArena French13911493
LMArena German13531472
LMArena Japanese12941485
LMArena Korean13131448
LMArena Russian13511480
LMArena Spanish13631454

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), GPT-5.4: 77.1 (#27)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
LMArena Instruction Following13361469
LiveBench Instruction Following85.8%—
IFEval84.1%—

Long Context GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), GPT-5.4: 50.3 (#8)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
LMArena Longer Query13441473
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—
CL-bench—27.9%
CL-bench Life—21.7%

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), GPT-5.4: 71.9 (#17)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)GPT-5.4
LMArena Text13541469
LMArena Creative Writing13401439
EQ-Bench Creative Writing11281840
LMArena Multi-Turn13501482
Short-Story Creative Writing73.8%—
WildBench80%—
EQ-Bench 4—1272
LiveBench Language51.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.4 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or GPT-5.4 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.6 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and GPT-5.4 share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 has 68.

Related comparisons

Go deeper