Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.6 to 32.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-04-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0765 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.26 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1446 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1359 |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 927.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1438 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 74.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 141.85 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 82.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1469 |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 73.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1447 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1260 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1420 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1427 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1434 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1401 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1305 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1442 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.