Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 3 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 37.0 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1268 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1284 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1255 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1276 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1276 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.