Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.3

Rank #319 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.9 to 23.9.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.328.3
Released2025-02-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1322999
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1324976
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math13091026
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1305980
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1323979
LMArena Chinese13391024
LMArena German1306902
LMArena Russian1328952
LMArena French1346—
LMArena Japanese1302—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1305979
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1321988

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1330997
LMArena Creative Writing1319969
LMArena Multi-Turn1307977
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper