Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen1.5-110B

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 38.0.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.834.2
Released2025-02-052024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3220

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding13221184
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts13241168
ForecastBench57.157.7
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math13091185
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert13051144
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English13231142
LMArena Chinese13391206
LMArena French13471151
LMArena German13061123
LMArena Japanese13011074
LMArena Korean13251044
LMArena Russian13281118
LMArena Spanish13131142

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following13051158
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query13201157

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13301175
LMArena Creative Writing13191148
LMArena Multi-Turn13071160
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Qwen1.5-110B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper