Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

OLMo 2 Furious 13B Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

29.7

Rank #304 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 6 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 35.0 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Data Analysis: 65.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 20.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.829.7
Released2025-02-052024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Coding47.1%10.4%
LMArena Coding1322—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%16.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%20.6%
LiveBench54.3%22.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1324—
DTBench52.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Omni-MATH37.4%15.6%
LiveBench Math58.1%13.6%
LMArena Math1309—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
MMLU-Pro72%31%
GPQA (HELM)50%31.6%
LMArena Expert1305—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1323—
LMArena Chinese1339—
LMArena French1347—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1328—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%60.6%
IFEval82.4%73%
LMArena Instruction Following1305—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1320—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteOLMo 2 Furious 13B
WildBench79%68.9%
LiveBench Language34.3%11.2%
LMArena Text1330—
LMArena Creative Writing1319—
LMArena Multi-Turn1307—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper