Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 42.7.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Noometry Index37.835.9
Released2025-02-052024-06-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13221209
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13241202
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13091216
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13051171
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13231206
LMArena Chinese13391214
LMArena French13471197
LMArena German13061192
LMArena Japanese13011128
LMArena Korean13251148
LMArena Russian13281219
LMArena Spanish13131195

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13051203
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13201225

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13301225
LMArena Creative Writing13191203
LMArena Multi-Turn13071214
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper