Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 51.7.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1466 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1445 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1430 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1449 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1428 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1445 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.