Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 51.7.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1460 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1247 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1434 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1445 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.5 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.