Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 34.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 90.9% for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 47.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1470 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 90.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 151.05 |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1491 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1283 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1443 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1464 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1451 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1468 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1434 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?
Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K2.6 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.