Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 51.7.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index37.843.1
Released2025-02-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding13221418
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts13241416
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math1309—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—
LMArena Expert1305—

Multimodal Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision11001180

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English13231382
LMArena Chinese1339—
LMArena French1347—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Russian1328—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following13051397
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query13201404

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text13301405
LMArena Creative Writing13191388
LMArena Multi-Turn13071422
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper