Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 26.1 to 22.0.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index37.839.6
Released2025-02-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding13221319
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts13241308
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math13091273
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—
LMArena Expert1305—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English13231285
LMArena Chinese13391358
LMArena Russian13281305
LMArena French1347—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following13051278
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query13201309

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text13301311
LMArena Creative Writing13191269
LMArena Multi-Turn13071303
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.9 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper