Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.4 mini
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 mini in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.5 to 35.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 80% for GPT-5.4 mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 45.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.50 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 46 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1438 |
| FrontierCode | — | 27% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 49.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 36.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1424 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 80% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 57 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 61.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 61.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 11% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 40.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.84 |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1419 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 51.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 9.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 21% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 28.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1435 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 86.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 29.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1245 |
Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1440 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1374 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1368 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1417 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1405 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1405 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1407 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1412 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1370 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1429 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1665 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GPT-5.4 mini?
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or GPT-5.4 mini better for coding?
GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.4 mini share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.