Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GLM-4.7

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7 leads 47.0 to 35.0.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index37.842.0
Released2025-02-052025-12-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked3236

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Coding13221454
LMArena WebDev—1435
SciCode—45.1%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
ALE-Bench—399.48

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
Terminal-Bench—33.4%
Vending-Bench 2—2,377

Reasoning GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts13241443
SimpleBench—47.7%
CritPt—1.7%
Chess Puzzles—6%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.51
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Math13091423
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—83.3%
ProofBench—6%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—2.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Expert13051424
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—32.2%
MMLU-Pro72%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.7%
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), GLM-4.7: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Non-English13231417
LMArena Chinese13391495
LMArena French13471432
LMArena German13061424
LMArena Japanese13011439
LMArena Korean13251399
LMArena Russian13281423
LMArena Spanish13131434

Instruction Following GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Instruction Following13051411
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Longer Query13201432
CL-bench—15.9%
CL-bench Life—10.9%

Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Text13301435
LMArena Creative Writing13191401
LMArena Multi-Turn13071446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1413
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.7 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper