Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-4.5V in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5V leads 27.4 to 22.0.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1347 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1354 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1353 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | 1154 |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1311 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1304 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1332 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.5V share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.