Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #23 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 22.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 97.1% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview specifications
Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index37.856.7
Released2025-02-052026-02-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$12
Results tracked3271

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Coding13221484
SWE-bench Verified—75.6%
DeepSWE—11.7%
LMArena WebDev—1447
SciCode—58.9%
GSO—22.6%
WeirdML—72.1%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
MirrorCode—8.9%
ALE-Bench—1,161
AlgoTune—2.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench—80.2%
APEX-Agents—35.3%
τ²-bench Banking—26%
DeepResearch Bench—47.8%
PostTrainBench—22%
BALROG—57%
ExploitBench—26.1%
GBAEval—0.8%
GDP.pdf—17%
LMArena Search—1211
METR Time Horizons—77%
Vending-Bench 2—3,774

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts13241485
DTBench52.5%97.1%
ForecastBench57.159
ARC-AGI-2—77.1%
SimpleBench—79.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—97.4%
ARC-AGI-1—98%
CritPt—17.7%
Chess Puzzles—55%
EnigmaEval—36.8%
Thematic Generalization—79.4%
EBR-Bench—14.3%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA—53.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.77
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Math13091485
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—59.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—26.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—86.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—36.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—16.7%

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Expert13051485
GPQA Diamond—94.4%
Humanity's Last Exam—46.4%
SimpleQA Verified—73.5%
MMLU-Pro72%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.4%
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision11001296
Blueprint-Bench 2—26.5%
Furniture Assembly—26.7%
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English13231477
LMArena Chinese13391529
LMArena French13471487
LMArena German13061491
LMArena Japanese13011493
LMArena Korean13251455
LMArena Russian13281498
LMArena Spanish13131479

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13051466
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query13201483
CL-bench—20.8%
CL-bench Life—16.9%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text13301481
LMArena Creative Writing13191482
LMArena Multi-Turn13071488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491
WildBench79%—
EQ-Bench 4—1142
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71.

Related comparisons

Go deeper