Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen3 8B
Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 8B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3 8B leads 30.2 to 17.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 59% | 59.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 136.17 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | — |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Qwen3 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 56.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 56.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | — |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen3 8B?
Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (34.2 vs 34.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen3 8B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.