Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen1.5-32B
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 52.4 to 34.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 57.2% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | 42% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Qwen1.5-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1130 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1155 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1126 |
| MMLU | 86.9% | 74.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Qwen1.5-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1089 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1116 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1140 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen1.5-32B share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.