Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen Turbo

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) Google

32.1

Rank #261 Confirmed

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

27.1

Rank #335 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 25.8 to 15.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.127.1
Released2024-02-152024-11-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked453

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
WeirdML22.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct43.8%—
LMArena Coding1294—
BigCodeBench Complete57.5%—
CadEval34%—
HumanEval+79.3%—
MBPP+74.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
TheAgentCompany3.4%—
Cybench7.5%—
BALROG21%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench27.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1296—
DTBench59%—
BIG-Bench Hard89.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index131.73—
ForecastBench58.4—

Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202523.1%6.1%
MATH Level 570.4%56.2%
Omni-MATH36.4%—
LMArena Math1315—

Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
GPQA Diamond57.2%41.8%
Humanity's Last Exam4.6%—
MMLU-Pro73.7%—
Confabulations13.5%—
GPQA (HELM)53.4%—
LMArena Expert1279—
MMLU86.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
LMArena Vision1161—
Video-MME75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
LMArena Non-English1312—
LMArena Chinese1331—
LMArena French1302—
LMArena German1286—
LMArena Japanese1292—
LMArena Korean1298—
LMArena Russian1320—
LMArena Spanish1311—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
IFEval83.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following1297—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
LMArena Longer Query1308—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Qwen Turbo: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Qwen Turbo
LMArena Text1319—
LMArena Creative Writing1333—
WildBench81.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1296—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen Turbo?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen Turbo share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper