Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 59% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 81.1% for Qwen Plus.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1328 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 59% | 81.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | 65.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1328 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1303 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1336 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen Plus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.