Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 24.9 to 12.3.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1318 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1302 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1301 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1289 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.