Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 45.5 to 35.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 73.7% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 41.4% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1210 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1208 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | 28.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1301 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.7% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1186 |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1199 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (33.8 vs 34.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.