Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 in 7 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads 26.8 to 12.3.
- Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 40.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2025-07-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 39.8 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1355 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 26.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1336 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 38.2 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1392 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 36.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1330 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 45.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1316 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1332 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 68.6 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1299 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 40.0 (#164)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1315 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 53.1 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1338 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1334 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 better for coding?
Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has 12.