Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.6 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 24.9% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 41.2% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-05-14 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 24.9% | 41.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | 1412 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| DTBench | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |
Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1365 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1338 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1346 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1357 |
| LMArena French | 1258 | 1398 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1325 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | 1310 |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | 1305 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | 1360 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1355 |
| IFEval | 83.1% | — |
Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1378 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1357 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1365 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Nova Premier 1.0
- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview