Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 51.3 to 26.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.3% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 86.7% for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2024-05-14 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.49 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 24.9% | 34.5% |
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 53.8% | 73.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | 143.93 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | 84.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | — |
| LMArena French | 1258 | — |
| LMArena German | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.2 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.