Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 38.8 to 14.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1399 |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1416 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1427 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.