Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Google

29.9

Rank #301 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) Alibaba (Qwen)

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.9—
Released2024-10-032024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Coding1218—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Hard Prompts1209—
DTBench50%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.14
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.6%—
LMArena Math1207—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
GPQA Diamond33%—
LMArena Expert1185—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%
MMLU—68%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Vision1044—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1215—
LMArena Chinese1231—
LMArena French1234—
LMArena German1206—
LMArena Japanese1150—
LMArena Korean1140—
LMArena Russian1236—
LMArena Spanish1212—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Instruction Following1199—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Longer Query1219—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1226—
LMArena Creative Writing1218—
LMArena Multi-Turn1185—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper