Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | — |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | — |
| LMArena French | 1234 | — |
| LMArena German | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.