Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen1.5-72B

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Google

29.7

Rank #292 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.3

Rank #282 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 30.7 to 13.3.
  • Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.730.3
Released2024-10-032024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2122

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Coding12181166
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242), Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts12101148
DTBench50%—

Math Qwen1.5-72B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296), Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math12071164
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.6%—

Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
GPQA Diamond33%28.8%
LMArena Expert11851136

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110), Qwen1.5-72B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Vision1044—

Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English12151135
LMArena Chinese12311186
LMArena French12331158
LMArena German12061084
LMArena Japanese11501061
LMArena Korean11401049
LMArena Russian12361104
LMArena Spanish12121110

Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following11991142

Long Context Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query12191157

Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text12261166
LMArena Creative Writing12181137
LMArena Multi-Turn11851160

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen1.5-72B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper