Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 4 Maverick score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 4 Maverick in 5 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 4 Maverick leads 33.3 to 16.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and 67% for Llama 4 Maverick.
- Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.3 (#318)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1302 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 15.6% |
| SciCode | — | 33.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 24.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 61.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 172.97 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 27.9 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.3% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242), Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#337)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1281 |
| DTBench | 50% | 61.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 55.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.6% |
| LMCA | — | 15.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.2 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
Math Llama 4 Maverick leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296), Llama 4 Maverick: 24.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | 20.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1299 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 42.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 73% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |
Knowledge Llama 4 Maverick leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285), Llama 4 Maverick: 33.3 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 67% |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1259 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81% |
| Confabulations | — | 22.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
Multimodal Llama 4 Maverick leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110), Llama 4 Maverick: 30.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | 1141 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 31.8% |
Multilingual Llama 4 Maverick leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224), Llama 4 Maverick: 42.4 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1277 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | 1258 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1291 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1203 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1293 |
Instruction Following Llama 4 Maverick leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231), Llama 4 Maverick: 71.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1267 |
| IFEval | — | 90.8% |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220), Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1280 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227), Llama 4 Maverick: 39.0 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1287 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1266 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1289 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 860 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 4 Maverick score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Llama 4 Maverick better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 26.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 4 Maverick share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.