Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 35.8 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221), Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | — |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | — |
| LMArena French | 1233 | — |
| LMArena German | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.