Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 49.2 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221), GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1453 |
| DeepSWE | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 49.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1692 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 28% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242), GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1420 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 90.1% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 53.3% |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296), GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1404 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285), GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1449 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.5% |
Multimodal GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110), GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 58.3% |
Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224), GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1377 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | — |
| LMArena German | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231), GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1406 |
Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220), GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227), GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1396 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1405 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2125 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and GPT-6 Sol share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 22.